FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP
Orphan Works: Senate Hotline Revisited
12.06.08
Yesterday, many of us received a letter from our Senator, one of the most prominent lawmakers in the country, expressing his support for strong intellectual property rights protections as a necessary stimulus to creativity and entrepreneurship.
He stated that the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008, S.2913 "is currently being carefully considered by the Senate," and he assured us:
"Members of my staff have met with representatives of artists and small business owners who have expressed many of the same concerns you mentioned. I will continue to closely study developments on this bill and I will work with both my Senate colleagues and the...artist community to ensure that any bill that is ultimately passed appropriately balances these competing concerns."
We've written to the Senator to inform him that the Shawn Bentley Act passed in the Senate on September 28, 2008, by unanimous consent, including his.
Frankly, we don't blame the Senator for not knowing that he's allegedly consented to a bill that would strip his constituents of their intellectual property rights without due process. Considering the way this controversial bill was drafted behind closed doors and passed by hotline, we suspect many Senators aren't aware that they've "consented" to this radical change to U.S. Copyright law either.
This makes it all the more important that the House not pass their version of this bill (H.R.5889) by a similar legislative maneuver.
Orphan Works legislation should be held over until the next Congress and subjected to an open and transparent public debate. Laws affecting the intellectual property rights of all citizens should not be brokered by lawyers and lobbyists in backroom deals.
Monday the Senate will convene for a lame duck session. A spokesman for House Speaker Pelosi confirmed yesterday that the House will convene on Tuesday. For now, the House is where we need to focus our attention.
House sources continue to assure us that Orphan Works is not on the agenda. However every prior effort to pass the bill by legislative maneuver was prefaced by similar assurances, so we believe it's in our best interests to stay vigilant. We'll update you as we learn more.
- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner for the Board of the Illustrators' Partnership
Starting Monday we'll conclude our series of little known facts about this legislation.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Sunday, September 28, 2008
PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO PREVENT THIS BILL FROM PASSING!
Orphan Works: The Devil's Own Day
Never Too Busy to Pass Special
Interest Legislation 9.28.08
As lawmakers struggled Friday to clean up the mess on Wall Street, sponsors of the Orphan Works Act passed more special interest legislation. Their bill would force copyright holders to subsidize giant copyright databases run by giant internet firms.
Like the companies now needing billion dollar bailouts, these copyright registries - which would theoretically contain the entire copyright wealth of the US - would presumably be "too big to fail." Yet it's our wealth, not theirs, the scheme would risk.
Small business owners didn't ask for this legislation. We don't want it and we don't need it. Our opposition numbers have been growing daily. So Friday, the bill's sponsors reached for the hotline.
What is Hotlining?
Critics of hotlining say "that lawmakers are essentially signing off on legislation neither they nor their staff have ever read."
"In order for a bill to be hotlined, the Senate Majority Leader and Minority Leader must agree to pass it by unanimous consent, without a roll-call vote. The two leaders then inform Members of this agreement using special hotlines installed in each office and give Members a specified amount of time to object - in some cases as little as 15 minutes. If no objection is registered, the bill is passed."
- Roll Call, Sept 17, 2007
In other words, a Senate bill can pass by "unanimous consent" even if some Senators don't know about it.
The Devil's Own Day
Senators Leahy and Hatch hotlined the Orphan Works Act twice last summer. Each time came at the end of a day, at the end of a week, near the end of a legislative session. Each time lawmakers were distracted by other issues and other plans. Each time artists rallied quickly and each time a Senator put a hold on the bill.
Friday the Senators found a new opportunity.
With lawmakers struggling to package a 700 billion dollar bailout to avert a worldwide economic meltdown, with the rest of the country focused on Presidential debates, with Washington in chaos and Congressional phone lines jammed, they hotlined an amended bill. On short notice, even the legislative aides we could reach by phone said they didn't have time to read it. And so, while we were rushing to get out a second email blast to artists, the bill passed by "unanimous consent" - in other words, by default.
What better way to pass a bill that was drafted in secret than to pass it while nobody's looking?
Since Friday, artists have been conducting bitter post mortems on their blogs. That's understandable, but it's not time yet.
"When Sherman arrived at Grant's headquarters later that evening, he found the general - broken sword and all - chewing on a soggy cigar in the rain, which had begun soaking the battlefield.
'Well, Grant,' Sherman said to his friend, 'we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?'
'Yes,' replied Grant, 'lick 'em tomorrow, though.'"
The Senate passed their bill Friday, but the House hasn't. There's still time to write, phone and fax your congressional representatives. Tell them not to let the House Judiciary Committee fold their bill and adopt the Senate's.
Tell Congress to protect the private property of small businesses. Lick 'em tomorrow.
- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators' Partnership
Quote from "The Devil's Own Day," by Christopher Allen, January 2000 America's Civil War Magazine
TAKE ACTION: EMAIL CONGRESS TONIGHT
Tell the House Judiciary Committee not to adopt the Senate version.
We've supplied a special letter for this purpose: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11980321
Please post or forward this message immediately to any interested party.
Never Too Busy to Pass Special
Interest Legislation 9.28.08
As lawmakers struggled Friday to clean up the mess on Wall Street, sponsors of the Orphan Works Act passed more special interest legislation. Their bill would force copyright holders to subsidize giant copyright databases run by giant internet firms.
Like the companies now needing billion dollar bailouts, these copyright registries - which would theoretically contain the entire copyright wealth of the US - would presumably be "too big to fail." Yet it's our wealth, not theirs, the scheme would risk.
Small business owners didn't ask for this legislation. We don't want it and we don't need it. Our opposition numbers have been growing daily. So Friday, the bill's sponsors reached for the hotline.
What is Hotlining?
Critics of hotlining say "that lawmakers are essentially signing off on legislation neither they nor their staff have ever read."
"In order for a bill to be hotlined, the Senate Majority Leader and Minority Leader must agree to pass it by unanimous consent, without a roll-call vote. The two leaders then inform Members of this agreement using special hotlines installed in each office and give Members a specified amount of time to object - in some cases as little as 15 minutes. If no objection is registered, the bill is passed."
- Roll Call, Sept 17, 2007
In other words, a Senate bill can pass by "unanimous consent" even if some Senators don't know about it.
The Devil's Own Day
Senators Leahy and Hatch hotlined the Orphan Works Act twice last summer. Each time came at the end of a day, at the end of a week, near the end of a legislative session. Each time lawmakers were distracted by other issues and other plans. Each time artists rallied quickly and each time a Senator put a hold on the bill.
Friday the Senators found a new opportunity.
With lawmakers struggling to package a 700 billion dollar bailout to avert a worldwide economic meltdown, with the rest of the country focused on Presidential debates, with Washington in chaos and Congressional phone lines jammed, they hotlined an amended bill. On short notice, even the legislative aides we could reach by phone said they didn't have time to read it. And so, while we were rushing to get out a second email blast to artists, the bill passed by "unanimous consent" - in other words, by default.
What better way to pass a bill that was drafted in secret than to pass it while nobody's looking?
Since Friday, artists have been conducting bitter post mortems on their blogs. That's understandable, but it's not time yet.
"When Sherman arrived at Grant's headquarters later that evening, he found the general - broken sword and all - chewing on a soggy cigar in the rain, which had begun soaking the battlefield.
'Well, Grant,' Sherman said to his friend, 'we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?'
'Yes,' replied Grant, 'lick 'em tomorrow, though.'"
The Senate passed their bill Friday, but the House hasn't. There's still time to write, phone and fax your congressional representatives. Tell them not to let the House Judiciary Committee fold their bill and adopt the Senate's.
Tell Congress to protect the private property of small businesses. Lick 'em tomorrow.
- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators' Partnership
Quote from "The Devil's Own Day," by Christopher Allen, January 2000 America's Civil War Magazine
TAKE ACTION: EMAIL CONGRESS TONIGHT
Tell the House Judiciary Committee not to adopt the Senate version.
We've supplied a special letter for this purpose: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11980321
Please post or forward this message immediately to any interested party.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Artificial Intelligence or Not?
Dialogue: City, self-proclaimed, “cutting-edge convergence of art and public life” has offered Denver 10 visiting artists to create site-specific works that coincide with the Democratic National Convention currently being held in Denver. Of these works, Lynn Hershmann’s piece Artificial Intelligence is Better than No Intelligence is on display at the Lab in Belmar. Other than its less-than-optimal location on the outskirts of Denver, DiNA, the artificial intelligence has me less than convinced that she was ready for such a high-profile public showing.
Considering that Dialogue: City was put together for the purpose of coinciding with the DNC, the chic and modern looking Lab may have been a good choice for Hershmann’s contemporary piece if it were not located 15 minutes outside of Denver (making it a difficult location for visitors to reach without a car). However, the building does lend to the works supposed modern feel and scientific references. Once entering the Lab, one must climb a stark white flight of stairs to enter the main floor. Viewers walk down a short, darkened corridor before they enter a large, dark, open room with a 3-dimensional projection of a woman’s head and shoulders. The image is of Hershmann’s presidential candidate, DiNA.
DiNA has been twelve years in the making. Dialogue: City has written of DiNA that she is, “charismatic, smart and able to answer any question a visitor might pose to a presidential candidate. Participants can inquire about her stance on the issues, as she is designed with voice recognition software and her ‘brain’ is connected to the internet, enabling her to process her answers immediately and interact in a unique dialogue”. In reality, DiNA does not answer all questions, infact, it could be debated whether DiNA understands all questions directed toward her. Also, DiNA does not interact immediately, sometimes it takes her about 10 seconds to answer, if she answers at all.
Hershmann’s concept of artificial intelligence would appear to be a contemporary medium and a relevant, even futuristic, topic. However, the execution of this medium is the opposite. DiNA looks like a photograph with two-dimensional moving lips, which are not accurate to the words which DiNA attempts to speak. DiNA’s appearance cannot even be compared to a photograph. Her outline is fuzzy and her entire look is unkempt. The aesthetic of DiNA is poor and instead of appearing contemporary, her technology makes her look dated. Considering that Disney’s 1998 animated film “Mulan” was able to mimic the movement of one’s mouth when speaking and compared to the character generation of today, Hershmann’s technology seems old-hat throwing her out of the contemporary realm. It would appear as if Dialogue: City directors Seth Goldberg and Liz Newton asked Hershmann if DiNA was almost finished and decided to go ahead and put the piece on public display. Poor decision.
When I visted DiNA in the Lab, it was clear to me that she was having trouble with her voice recognition feature. She would not answer viewer’s questions and kept repeating over the audience’s voices, “Please speak into the microphone”. When I attempted to address this with Goldberg he curtly informed me that DiNA has an attitude, sometimes she ignores people. He reminded me that DiNA is a presidential candidate and that she will not always answer everyone’s questions. So then…DiNA has been programmed with an attitude. I like that, I can get down with that. However, when Goldberg went to speak with her, DiNA responded as if no one else were in the room. It is so that DiNA has a personality, but her personality is one that has clearly not been refined enough to be a public personality. What Goldberg attempts to pass off as DiNA’s sass, in fact, appears to be malfunctioning software. It is a large stretch to try and disguise DiNA’s digital shortcomings as her programmed attitude. She interacts well with voices with which is familiar, but she has a difficult time being intelligent in front of an audience. I believe it was poor choice on Dialoge: City’s and Hershmann’s part to debut this finicky work of art which is sad to look at and even more pathetic to try to communicate with.
***For Works Cited Please Contact Author.
Considering that Dialogue: City was put together for the purpose of coinciding with the DNC, the chic and modern looking Lab may have been a good choice for Hershmann’s contemporary piece if it were not located 15 minutes outside of Denver (making it a difficult location for visitors to reach without a car). However, the building does lend to the works supposed modern feel and scientific references. Once entering the Lab, one must climb a stark white flight of stairs to enter the main floor. Viewers walk down a short, darkened corridor before they enter a large, dark, open room with a 3-dimensional projection of a woman’s head and shoulders. The image is of Hershmann’s presidential candidate, DiNA.
DiNA has been twelve years in the making. Dialogue: City has written of DiNA that she is, “charismatic, smart and able to answer any question a visitor might pose to a presidential candidate. Participants can inquire about her stance on the issues, as she is designed with voice recognition software and her ‘brain’ is connected to the internet, enabling her to process her answers immediately and interact in a unique dialogue”. In reality, DiNA does not answer all questions, infact, it could be debated whether DiNA understands all questions directed toward her. Also, DiNA does not interact immediately, sometimes it takes her about 10 seconds to answer, if she answers at all.
Hershmann’s concept of artificial intelligence would appear to be a contemporary medium and a relevant, even futuristic, topic. However, the execution of this medium is the opposite. DiNA looks like a photograph with two-dimensional moving lips, which are not accurate to the words which DiNA attempts to speak. DiNA’s appearance cannot even be compared to a photograph. Her outline is fuzzy and her entire look is unkempt. The aesthetic of DiNA is poor and instead of appearing contemporary, her technology makes her look dated. Considering that Disney’s 1998 animated film “Mulan” was able to mimic the movement of one’s mouth when speaking and compared to the character generation of today, Hershmann’s technology seems old-hat throwing her out of the contemporary realm. It would appear as if Dialogue: City directors Seth Goldberg and Liz Newton asked Hershmann if DiNA was almost finished and decided to go ahead and put the piece on public display. Poor decision.
When I visted DiNA in the Lab, it was clear to me that she was having trouble with her voice recognition feature. She would not answer viewer’s questions and kept repeating over the audience’s voices, “Please speak into the microphone”. When I attempted to address this with Goldberg he curtly informed me that DiNA has an attitude, sometimes she ignores people. He reminded me that DiNA is a presidential candidate and that she will not always answer everyone’s questions. So then…DiNA has been programmed with an attitude. I like that, I can get down with that. However, when Goldberg went to speak with her, DiNA responded as if no one else were in the room. It is so that DiNA has a personality, but her personality is one that has clearly not been refined enough to be a public personality. What Goldberg attempts to pass off as DiNA’s sass, in fact, appears to be malfunctioning software. It is a large stretch to try and disguise DiNA’s digital shortcomings as her programmed attitude. She interacts well with voices with which is familiar, but she has a difficult time being intelligent in front of an audience. I believe it was poor choice on Dialoge: City’s and Hershmann’s part to debut this finicky work of art which is sad to look at and even more pathetic to try to communicate with.
***For Works Cited Please Contact Author.
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Ladakhi Region Fashion and the Role of the Female
*This is what I worked on researching in India.
At approximately 11,500 feet above sea level, Ladakh is a region in the Northern Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir that opens its doors to the world for a colorful, albeit brief summer season. A convergence point of traditional fashions, Leh the capital city of Ladakh, becomes a small cosmopolitan city showcasing its collection of lively local Ladakhi and Tibetan clothing. Although meant to be first and foremost functional, Ladakhi and Tibetan female residents wear intricate, layered, luscious clothing that speaks of their cultural couture abilities. Not only functional and stylish, Ladakhi and Tibetan women’s fashions also imitate that of Buddhist Goddess and female Bodhisattva depictions of the 10-15th centuries. Ladakhi region feminine fashion a marker of social status and heritage and denotes the female role in society and family life as compared to the ideal Buddhist woman.
The Ladakhi Fashion
A typical Ladakhi women’s outfit includes four main articles of clothing. The first is the tipi, or Ladakhi hat. The tipi is a high-top hat with upturned corners. It sits atop the head, back from the forehead and exposes the part of the hair. Made from brocade, it is a daring fashion statement to the Western eye. The next article of clothing is the tilin, a half shirt made of cotton, nylon or silk that is loose fitting. It has wide sleeves that can be rolled up during the warm months. It can be plain or patterned with light designs of tonality or sparkling embroidery. A tilin is mostly worn when coupled with a wedding gongcha, or the Ladakhi dress. The gongcha is traditionally a thick dress that resembles more of a coat, with long sleeves and a hem that falls just above the ankles. It can appear in a range of colors and designs and cost anywhere from approximately 500 rupees to 80,000 rupees for a wedding gongcha. When not paired with a tilin, a simple sulwar kurta, or loose fitting pants and long Indian shirt that reaches above the knee, is worn underneath with the everyday working Ladakhi outfit. The daily gongcha can be cotton, polyester, wool, velvet or a combination of these. Wool is even worn in the hot summer months. While daily gongcha are mostly a burgundy, black or gray or earthen color, wedding dresses are brightly colored and made from brocade silk fabrics imported from China, Korea, Japan and Nepal. Lastly, tied around the waist of the Ladakhi dress is a belt called the kayruck. Often matching the inner tilin in color, the kayruck is made of a thicker fabric and used to cinch the waist. This allowing the gongcha to puff out around the body creating a decidedly elegant ball gown effect.
Ladakhi wedding dresses are elaborate works of art that entirely cover the female body. Including the brocade gongcha, tilin and matching kayruck, brides are also adorned with a square cape called a yogar. The yogar can be embroidered cottons or brocade silk with rainbow tassels or sheep’s wool lining. Tied in the front and resting on the brides’ shoulders, the cape helps to hide the bride’s face, a Ladakhi tradition that may stem from ideals surrounding the virgin Buddhist goddess Tara. Also shielding the bride is a parak, instead of a tipi. The parak is the bridal headdress that is often a family heirloom passed down from mother to daughter. Heavy with turquoise, coral, shells and other family gems, the parak sits atop the bride’s bowed head and expands outwards from both sides, emulating the appearance of the cobra, “tapering off like a snake skin at the back”. Black animal hair and yak felt decorate the flaps and hang down in braids framing the woman’s face. This headpiece is said to symbolize, “a snake skin, harking back to the cobra whose hood sheltered Lord Buddha in meditation”.
Often taking an entire month to put together, the Ladakhi wedding dress is a mass of colorful silk material that entirely covers the bride’s body, perhaps to shield her from impurity before she marries. At the wedding, the bride appears clothed in symbolic auspicious fabrics, white silky prayer clothes and rupees sewn to her person to ensure her good luck and prosperity in marriage. In fact, the Ladakhi bride much resembles 10th century images of Bodhisattvas in the Dukhang of the Tabo monastery while embodying qualities of the Goddess Tara. Considering that a bride is expected to enter a marital union a virgin and come prepared to cultivate family relations, it may be stated that the Ladakhi bride is dressed to emulate a Bodhisattva and Buddhist Goddess.
The Ladakhi Woman as a Buddhist Goddess and Bodhisattva
The comparison between the Ladakhi bride and the Tabo Bodhisattvas can be made when examining the dress of each. The Tabo Bodhisattvas, the Dukhang, sit suspended from the walls. Jutting out from the paintings, these Bodhisattvas float in mid-air. Dressed in rich auspicious fabrics, white prayer clothes, and sometimes rupees at their feet, these Bodhisattvas appear sensual and intensely fashionable in their silken garb. Just like the Bodhisattva, the Ladakhi bride is adorned with sumptuous fabrics of Eastern origin and covered with white silk prayer clothes, auspicious red and golden swatches and rupees. In this sense, when the Ladakhi women marry, they are expected to embody the qualities of a Bodhisattva. When compared to the Bodhisattva, or one who sacrifices his or her chance for potential enlightenment to help others, the Ladakhi woman takes on the role of one who sacrifices her own achievements to help others. This may take the form of working the family store, baring children, and/or cultivating a comfortable family life. When compared to the image of Tara, the Buddhist goddess who is, “compared to a virgin, a mother and a queen…and protect[s] against the eight great terrors”, the Ladakhi woman suddenly takes on a zenith role as family protectress. Although the Ladakhi woman is also expected to be pure and innocent, she is not thought of as fragile and demurely submissive. The Ladakhi female is seen as a necessary counterpart and strong womanly presence of wisdom. Just as the cobra protected the Buddha, so the Ladakhi woman must protect her family from evil.
In Buddhism, the idea of the female and male counterpart or consort is prevalent. When a male and female are depicted together in union, it is a representation of the “oneness of the two necessary elements for the generation of enlightenment: wisdom, a passive female principle and skillful means, an active male principle, [who join] together on the plane of ultimate reality”. Therefore, the fashions worn by Ladakhi women may seem oppressive, considering these full-body heavy gongcha are worn even during the summer months, but stylish hints elevate the woman and showcase her importance and equivalence as the male counterpart. Just as the Buddha would have been unprotected without the cobra, the Ladakhi woman’s parallel role as protectress is highlighted by her parak. Yet, this snake-like image does not make her an ugly or devious presence as may be misconstrued in Western ideology. Instead, her abilities as wife, mother and guardian are associated with this image. Furthermore, the Ladakhi woman’s cinched waist, which produces large hips of fabric, may serve to echo the tiny curved waist and broad child-bearing hips of the goddess Tara. Thus, because female Ladakhi fashion is an imitation of these Buddhist feminine ideals, the clothing of Ladakh serves more than just an aesthetic value. It beautifies its women and reveals them to society as an, “anima figure [for men], for women…a role model, and for both sexes…a form of…transcendental compassion”.
The Tibetan Fashion
Within the city of Leh, an entirely different fashion has emerged from Tibet. Due to the large numbers of Tibetan refugees, many women wear their cultural heritage and display their roots through traditional clothing. Despite the geographical proximity of the two cultures, Tibetan dress differs wholly from Ladakhi attire in both appearance and symbolism.
A Tibetan outfit consists of three main articles: the unjew, the chupa, and the panday. The unjew is a half shirt that is loose fitting and comes in a one-size-fits-all cut, costing anywhere from 150 rupees to 1,000 rupees. It is exactly the same type of shirt as the Ladakhi tilin. Over the unjew, Tibetan women wear a chupa, which is a long floor-length, sleeveless dress that rests close to the body cylindrically. This can be made from cotton, wool or silk and cost 300 to 9,000 rupees. The chupa has two long ties on either side that wrap around the waist and tie in the back in a way that accentuates the buttocks of the Tibetan woman while adding curvature to the waist. Also wrapped around the waist is the panday. The panday is an apron that falls just past the knees. It is worn to convey the fact that a Tibetan woman is married. Ranging in color from pale grays to bright neon colors, the panday is always a dense material decorated with horizontal stripes of varying thickness. The panday is the least expensive article of clothing, costing as low as 100 rupees to only as high as 500 rupees. The apron serves as a purely stylistic affect with no functional use whatsoever, other than to signify the marriage status of the woman. Another signifier of marriage within Tibetan culture revolves around the jewelry, which plays a larger role in Tibetan dress than Ladkahi. For Tibetans, women who are unmarried may not wear the panday, but they are also prohibited from wearing large jewelry. Although, young woman now may wear small stud earrings, they still cannot wear necklaces, bracelets or bulky earrings. Unmarried girls often also wear their hair in two long braids with colored yarn braided into the strands.
The tradition of headgear and jewelry for the Ladakhi Tibetans is rich with history and symbolism. The custom Tibetan hat is called the usha par. This hat is made of silken brocade fabrics with a hard circular base that allows it to sit around the head. On all four sides, four fur-lined flaps jut out horizontally creating a distinctly Tibetan look. These flaps also help to protect the wearer from harsh sun rays and winter weather. “The flaps of the hat [are] worn down in winter to protect ears from the cold. The flap to the back of the head [is] worn down to keep the neck warm. In warmer weather the flaps [are] worn up. The flap to the back of the head [is] worn down in summer to protect the neck from sunburn.” Both woman and men may wear this hat. Although the Tibetan tradition does not have a head piece as sumptuous as the Ladakhi wedding parak, females do wear a head piece called a namung for graduating from school. The namung is much simpler and delicate than the heavy parak and it rests gently against the head. It has four leather strips adorned with turquoise or coral that hang down around the head, pearls strung between the strips cascade in rows of five or six down the hair and forehead.
The Jewels of a Tibetan Woman as Compared to Tara
Because jewelry is such an intimate, “marker of wealth and status [and] it [identifies] its wearer in a number of ways often simultaneously—region, castes, marital status, personal achievements,” it is interesting to note not only the fashions of Tibetan head pieces, but also the significance of such extravagance. When examining depictions of Tara or any Buddhist female deity, the sumptuousness with which these cosmic women are depicted is astounding. The most famous image of Tara ornaments the lower left corner of the wall behind a statue of the Bodhisattva of Compassion, Avalokiteshvara, in the Sumtsek temple at Alchi. In this 11th to 13th painting, voluptuous Tara is shown in all her divine glory as a young goddess of about 16 years with full, round breasts and strings of jewels embellishing her curvaceous body. Although depicted young and beautiful, the weight of the world rests on Tara’s shoulders. Her job as protectress, mother, and queen is not one of ease. She is, “like a mother instantly and unthinkingly leaping into danger if her child is threatened. [Tara] steps down at once to give aid and protection to any living being who calls on her”. Thus, when considering the Tibetan woman and her ability to wear jewelry only after marriage, it may be that because Tara embodies these difficult life duties, the young, unmarried and carefree Tibetan woman does not have the life experience to privilege the wearing of luscious and rich jewels. Only after a Tibetan woman is married and expected to take on wifely duties may she then be worthy of comparing herself to Tara in mind and body.
Also, (as previously mentioned) the namung, or Tibetan female’s graduation cap, is also a marker of social status and psychological development as compared to Tara. This semi-precious head adornment used to denote the graduation of a female serves to cover her head, the origin of her intelligence, and elevates her status visually by its appearance alone. A 2,000 rupee or more head piece, the namung displays the education and wealth of a Tibetan young woman, ideally adding to her social and cultural appearance. Considering that Tara is the Goddess of Wisdom, it may be concluded that, again, the Tibetan woman draws upon the jewels and representations of Tara to illustrate her goddess-like qualities. Just as wise Tara is placed beside the figure of compassion, Avalokiteshvara and therefore contrasts him, so the Tibetan bride must be viewed as a wise and worthy contrast to her male counterpart.
Conclusion
Ladakhi and Tibetan woman have rich cultures of traditional haute couture. Both use fashion as a means to communicate social and marital status, wealth, intelligence and life maturity. Using clothing as a means of self expression, Ladakhi and Tibetan women draw from the ideal Buddhists feminine image to establish high social and family status. By comparing themselves in this manner, fashion becomes a mechanism of enlightenment in that it is used as symbolic costuming to put the woman in a place of ultimate Buddhist power both in a public and private realm.
***For Works Cited Contact Author.
At approximately 11,500 feet above sea level, Ladakh is a region in the Northern Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir that opens its doors to the world for a colorful, albeit brief summer season. A convergence point of traditional fashions, Leh the capital city of Ladakh, becomes a small cosmopolitan city showcasing its collection of lively local Ladakhi and Tibetan clothing. Although meant to be first and foremost functional, Ladakhi and Tibetan female residents wear intricate, layered, luscious clothing that speaks of their cultural couture abilities. Not only functional and stylish, Ladakhi and Tibetan women’s fashions also imitate that of Buddhist Goddess and female Bodhisattva depictions of the 10-15th centuries. Ladakhi region feminine fashion a marker of social status and heritage and denotes the female role in society and family life as compared to the ideal Buddhist woman.
The Ladakhi Fashion
A typical Ladakhi women’s outfit includes four main articles of clothing. The first is the tipi, or Ladakhi hat. The tipi is a high-top hat with upturned corners. It sits atop the head, back from the forehead and exposes the part of the hair. Made from brocade, it is a daring fashion statement to the Western eye. The next article of clothing is the tilin, a half shirt made of cotton, nylon or silk that is loose fitting. It has wide sleeves that can be rolled up during the warm months. It can be plain or patterned with light designs of tonality or sparkling embroidery. A tilin is mostly worn when coupled with a wedding gongcha, or the Ladakhi dress. The gongcha is traditionally a thick dress that resembles more of a coat, with long sleeves and a hem that falls just above the ankles. It can appear in a range of colors and designs and cost anywhere from approximately 500 rupees to 80,000 rupees for a wedding gongcha. When not paired with a tilin, a simple sulwar kurta, or loose fitting pants and long Indian shirt that reaches above the knee, is worn underneath with the everyday working Ladakhi outfit. The daily gongcha can be cotton, polyester, wool, velvet or a combination of these. Wool is even worn in the hot summer months. While daily gongcha are mostly a burgundy, black or gray or earthen color, wedding dresses are brightly colored and made from brocade silk fabrics imported from China, Korea, Japan and Nepal. Lastly, tied around the waist of the Ladakhi dress is a belt called the kayruck. Often matching the inner tilin in color, the kayruck is made of a thicker fabric and used to cinch the waist. This allowing the gongcha to puff out around the body creating a decidedly elegant ball gown effect.
Ladakhi wedding dresses are elaborate works of art that entirely cover the female body. Including the brocade gongcha, tilin and matching kayruck, brides are also adorned with a square cape called a yogar. The yogar can be embroidered cottons or brocade silk with rainbow tassels or sheep’s wool lining. Tied in the front and resting on the brides’ shoulders, the cape helps to hide the bride’s face, a Ladakhi tradition that may stem from ideals surrounding the virgin Buddhist goddess Tara. Also shielding the bride is a parak, instead of a tipi. The parak is the bridal headdress that is often a family heirloom passed down from mother to daughter. Heavy with turquoise, coral, shells and other family gems, the parak sits atop the bride’s bowed head and expands outwards from both sides, emulating the appearance of the cobra, “tapering off like a snake skin at the back”. Black animal hair and yak felt decorate the flaps and hang down in braids framing the woman’s face. This headpiece is said to symbolize, “a snake skin, harking back to the cobra whose hood sheltered Lord Buddha in meditation”.
Often taking an entire month to put together, the Ladakhi wedding dress is a mass of colorful silk material that entirely covers the bride’s body, perhaps to shield her from impurity before she marries. At the wedding, the bride appears clothed in symbolic auspicious fabrics, white silky prayer clothes and rupees sewn to her person to ensure her good luck and prosperity in marriage. In fact, the Ladakhi bride much resembles 10th century images of Bodhisattvas in the Dukhang of the Tabo monastery while embodying qualities of the Goddess Tara. Considering that a bride is expected to enter a marital union a virgin and come prepared to cultivate family relations, it may be stated that the Ladakhi bride is dressed to emulate a Bodhisattva and Buddhist Goddess.
The Ladakhi Woman as a Buddhist Goddess and Bodhisattva
The comparison between the Ladakhi bride and the Tabo Bodhisattvas can be made when examining the dress of each. The Tabo Bodhisattvas, the Dukhang, sit suspended from the walls. Jutting out from the paintings, these Bodhisattvas float in mid-air. Dressed in rich auspicious fabrics, white prayer clothes, and sometimes rupees at their feet, these Bodhisattvas appear sensual and intensely fashionable in their silken garb. Just like the Bodhisattva, the Ladakhi bride is adorned with sumptuous fabrics of Eastern origin and covered with white silk prayer clothes, auspicious red and golden swatches and rupees. In this sense, when the Ladakhi women marry, they are expected to embody the qualities of a Bodhisattva. When compared to the Bodhisattva, or one who sacrifices his or her chance for potential enlightenment to help others, the Ladakhi woman takes on the role of one who sacrifices her own achievements to help others. This may take the form of working the family store, baring children, and/or cultivating a comfortable family life. When compared to the image of Tara, the Buddhist goddess who is, “compared to a virgin, a mother and a queen…and protect[s] against the eight great terrors”, the Ladakhi woman suddenly takes on a zenith role as family protectress. Although the Ladakhi woman is also expected to be pure and innocent, she is not thought of as fragile and demurely submissive. The Ladakhi female is seen as a necessary counterpart and strong womanly presence of wisdom. Just as the cobra protected the Buddha, so the Ladakhi woman must protect her family from evil.
In Buddhism, the idea of the female and male counterpart or consort is prevalent. When a male and female are depicted together in union, it is a representation of the “oneness of the two necessary elements for the generation of enlightenment: wisdom, a passive female principle and skillful means, an active male principle, [who join] together on the plane of ultimate reality”. Therefore, the fashions worn by Ladakhi women may seem oppressive, considering these full-body heavy gongcha are worn even during the summer months, but stylish hints elevate the woman and showcase her importance and equivalence as the male counterpart. Just as the Buddha would have been unprotected without the cobra, the Ladakhi woman’s parallel role as protectress is highlighted by her parak. Yet, this snake-like image does not make her an ugly or devious presence as may be misconstrued in Western ideology. Instead, her abilities as wife, mother and guardian are associated with this image. Furthermore, the Ladakhi woman’s cinched waist, which produces large hips of fabric, may serve to echo the tiny curved waist and broad child-bearing hips of the goddess Tara. Thus, because female Ladakhi fashion is an imitation of these Buddhist feminine ideals, the clothing of Ladakh serves more than just an aesthetic value. It beautifies its women and reveals them to society as an, “anima figure [for men], for women…a role model, and for both sexes…a form of…transcendental compassion”.
The Tibetan Fashion
Within the city of Leh, an entirely different fashion has emerged from Tibet. Due to the large numbers of Tibetan refugees, many women wear their cultural heritage and display their roots through traditional clothing. Despite the geographical proximity of the two cultures, Tibetan dress differs wholly from Ladakhi attire in both appearance and symbolism.
A Tibetan outfit consists of three main articles: the unjew, the chupa, and the panday. The unjew is a half shirt that is loose fitting and comes in a one-size-fits-all cut, costing anywhere from 150 rupees to 1,000 rupees. It is exactly the same type of shirt as the Ladakhi tilin. Over the unjew, Tibetan women wear a chupa, which is a long floor-length, sleeveless dress that rests close to the body cylindrically. This can be made from cotton, wool or silk and cost 300 to 9,000 rupees. The chupa has two long ties on either side that wrap around the waist and tie in the back in a way that accentuates the buttocks of the Tibetan woman while adding curvature to the waist. Also wrapped around the waist is the panday. The panday is an apron that falls just past the knees. It is worn to convey the fact that a Tibetan woman is married. Ranging in color from pale grays to bright neon colors, the panday is always a dense material decorated with horizontal stripes of varying thickness. The panday is the least expensive article of clothing, costing as low as 100 rupees to only as high as 500 rupees. The apron serves as a purely stylistic affect with no functional use whatsoever, other than to signify the marriage status of the woman. Another signifier of marriage within Tibetan culture revolves around the jewelry, which plays a larger role in Tibetan dress than Ladkahi. For Tibetans, women who are unmarried may not wear the panday, but they are also prohibited from wearing large jewelry. Although, young woman now may wear small stud earrings, they still cannot wear necklaces, bracelets or bulky earrings. Unmarried girls often also wear their hair in two long braids with colored yarn braided into the strands.
The tradition of headgear and jewelry for the Ladakhi Tibetans is rich with history and symbolism. The custom Tibetan hat is called the usha par. This hat is made of silken brocade fabrics with a hard circular base that allows it to sit around the head. On all four sides, four fur-lined flaps jut out horizontally creating a distinctly Tibetan look. These flaps also help to protect the wearer from harsh sun rays and winter weather. “The flaps of the hat [are] worn down in winter to protect ears from the cold. The flap to the back of the head [is] worn down to keep the neck warm. In warmer weather the flaps [are] worn up. The flap to the back of the head [is] worn down in summer to protect the neck from sunburn.” Both woman and men may wear this hat. Although the Tibetan tradition does not have a head piece as sumptuous as the Ladakhi wedding parak, females do wear a head piece called a namung for graduating from school. The namung is much simpler and delicate than the heavy parak and it rests gently against the head. It has four leather strips adorned with turquoise or coral that hang down around the head, pearls strung between the strips cascade in rows of five or six down the hair and forehead.
The Jewels of a Tibetan Woman as Compared to Tara
Because jewelry is such an intimate, “marker of wealth and status [and] it [identifies] its wearer in a number of ways often simultaneously—region, castes, marital status, personal achievements,” it is interesting to note not only the fashions of Tibetan head pieces, but also the significance of such extravagance. When examining depictions of Tara or any Buddhist female deity, the sumptuousness with which these cosmic women are depicted is astounding. The most famous image of Tara ornaments the lower left corner of the wall behind a statue of the Bodhisattva of Compassion, Avalokiteshvara, in the Sumtsek temple at Alchi. In this 11th to 13th painting, voluptuous Tara is shown in all her divine glory as a young goddess of about 16 years with full, round breasts and strings of jewels embellishing her curvaceous body. Although depicted young and beautiful, the weight of the world rests on Tara’s shoulders. Her job as protectress, mother, and queen is not one of ease. She is, “like a mother instantly and unthinkingly leaping into danger if her child is threatened. [Tara] steps down at once to give aid and protection to any living being who calls on her”. Thus, when considering the Tibetan woman and her ability to wear jewelry only after marriage, it may be that because Tara embodies these difficult life duties, the young, unmarried and carefree Tibetan woman does not have the life experience to privilege the wearing of luscious and rich jewels. Only after a Tibetan woman is married and expected to take on wifely duties may she then be worthy of comparing herself to Tara in mind and body.
Also, (as previously mentioned) the namung, or Tibetan female’s graduation cap, is also a marker of social status and psychological development as compared to Tara. This semi-precious head adornment used to denote the graduation of a female serves to cover her head, the origin of her intelligence, and elevates her status visually by its appearance alone. A 2,000 rupee or more head piece, the namung displays the education and wealth of a Tibetan young woman, ideally adding to her social and cultural appearance. Considering that Tara is the Goddess of Wisdom, it may be concluded that, again, the Tibetan woman draws upon the jewels and representations of Tara to illustrate her goddess-like qualities. Just as wise Tara is placed beside the figure of compassion, Avalokiteshvara and therefore contrasts him, so the Tibetan bride must be viewed as a wise and worthy contrast to her male counterpart.
Conclusion
Ladakhi and Tibetan woman have rich cultures of traditional haute couture. Both use fashion as a means to communicate social and marital status, wealth, intelligence and life maturity. Using clothing as a means of self expression, Ladakhi and Tibetan women draw from the ideal Buddhists feminine image to establish high social and family status. By comparing themselves in this manner, fashion becomes a mechanism of enlightenment in that it is used as symbolic costuming to put the woman in a place of ultimate Buddhist power both in a public and private realm.
***For Works Cited Contact Author.
Friday, August 1, 2008
Murakami
When you entered into the sunlight again after a rather arduous subway ride through Brooklyn, the Brooklyn Museum was a welcomed first sight. On Sunday June 8, I had the privileged opportunity to visit this museum the day before I left for India. It was so worth it.
For a mere $8.oo with valid student I.D. I gained access to both a small exhibit on Ukiyo-e prints and the Murakami exhibit.
The Ukiyo-e print exhibit was well laid out and showcased works from the Utagawa school of art. With prints by Utamaro, Hiroshige I and II, Toyokuni and Kuniyoshi, this exhibit was mandatory for the Japanese art lover. I found myself staring at color prints of Kabuki actors and Japanese fables illustrated. There was also a nice little section on the naughty Ukiyo-e prints.
One interesting fact that I picked up from the excellent corresponding posters and text panels was that Hiroshige actually coined the term "manga" in the 19th century to mean "lazy drawing". Easily identifiable are the strict parallels that can be drawn between these Ukiyo-e masters and today's contempories in Manga.
This exhibit conveniently prefaced Murakami's show. Ironically (or not), Murakami was trained in the traditional art of Japan before breaking through and coining a phrase of his own: "Superflat". The Brooklyn Museum utilized Murakami's art historical theory of Superflat and gave it a proper display.
Upon entering the show on the fifth floor, one met Miss Ko2. Wearing what mimicked a waitress suit with blonde hair, large perky breasts and legs that never end, she stood eager and willing to please. The figure is an embodiment of the otaku subculture in Japan. As with Hiropan and Second Mission Miss Ko2, who appeared later in the exhibit, Murakami explores his own cultural misgivings. The otaku is characterized as “lonely and psychologically disturbed…[one] who exemplif[ies] the ‘murderous and anti-social…’"*. Imagine a young boy in front of his WOW game on the computer all day. His feminine ideal is warped. With these unreal femmes, Murakami draws from the otaku fantasy creations while making social commentary on a culture, perhaps, too connected by machinery--or not connected at all.
Moving into the center of this part of the show, one was drawn to three figures suspended on a circular plate. Meet Second Mission Ko2. This was, by far my favourite piece in the show. Murakami portrays Ko2 with blue hair, naked breasts, torso and genitals and cyborg legs and arms. Move to the second figure of Second Mission Ko2, and you saw that she was transforming like a...well, Transformer. Her breast plate (which extended down to her naked vagina) was lifting outward toward the viewer so the viewer was forced to meet head on with her bare prepubescent genitalia. Hard to notice much else when a resin clitoris is in your face, but examining the work, you could almost hear engines decompressing and gears pumping. Moving to the third and final figure, she had finally morphed into a jet. Rainbow wings and colored arms and legs that folded up nicely to create a masculine piece of machinery. A comment on the (manufactured and undervalued) role of women in Japanese society or coincidence? I think the former, not the later.
The next exciting piece of the gallery was immediately to the right upon entering the center circle. Behind a wall you were introduced to Murakami's animated creations: Kanye West's music video and his own "guardians" (as they've been dubbed) Kaikai and Kiki. Kaikai and Kiki star in 10-11 minute short films with both pathos and bathos. Also, you got to preview Murakami's live action film "Dharma" set to appear summer 2009. I won't give anything away (actually, there isn't much to give away, as there was no real dialogue in the preview), but it is definitely going to be exciting! Murakami truly has his eggs in many baskets.
Moving on, once you got past this initial gallery, you entered into a fully functioning store that sold Louis Vuitton bags. Luscious. That's all I have to say. But, if you didn't already know, Carl Lagerfeld (LV fashion designer) asked Murakami to collaborate with him on LV Bags a while back, thus those crazy eyeballs and bright colors you see on LV nowadays: Murakami's doing.
After being "oooed and ahhhed" by the beautiful Louis Vuitton bags, you moved into a room where you were surrounded by daisy faces. And I do mean literally surrounded because the walls have sheets of daisy face wallpaper on them. Not an inch of white wall is showing (imagine the work that went into that!). In the middle is a resin sculpture of Daisy faces and other kawaii things while more paintings adorn the wall. One truly feels Murakami's idea of "Superflat" in this room.
Next stop is the fourth floor. Down here, you met Hiropon and her counterpart My Lonesome Cowboy and more depictions of Kaikia and Kiki. (If you aren't already familiar with Hiropon, she was on display at the Denver Art Museum two summers ago for the contemporary art exhibit. She was the naked one with pink hair and obscene breasts squirting a circle of milk around herself. But we didn't get to see her companion because the DAM thought it too sexually provacative...hmmm....wacky ethics, anyone? Oh, and another quick side note: The Logan's were lending a piece to this show, too--wow!) One painting that stood out to me in this bit of the exhibit...the title currently escapes me, I apologize, was very large and depicted Kaikai spewing the most colorful and beautiful bile out of her sharp-toothed mouth as Kiki stood in the corner with Japanese prayer flags on a hill. (I'm leaving out a LOT of detail for this picture, here). It was, by far, the most violent work in the show and speaks directly to Japan's rather recent war history. Something which Murakami draws on profusely.
Exiting the show, there was a gift store where you could drop $42.oo on a t-shirt or $100.oo on daisy face pillows or $65.oo on the show's catalog. I imagine Murakami sits laughing all day in his studio as people pay outrageous prices for his mass manufactured works. How's that for art of the 21st century?
***For Works Cited Contact Author.
For a mere $8.oo with valid student I.D. I gained access to both a small exhibit on Ukiyo-e prints and the Murakami exhibit.
The Ukiyo-e print exhibit was well laid out and showcased works from the Utagawa school of art. With prints by Utamaro, Hiroshige I and II, Toyokuni and Kuniyoshi, this exhibit was mandatory for the Japanese art lover. I found myself staring at color prints of Kabuki actors and Japanese fables illustrated. There was also a nice little section on the naughty Ukiyo-e prints.
One interesting fact that I picked up from the excellent corresponding posters and text panels was that Hiroshige actually coined the term "manga" in the 19th century to mean "lazy drawing". Easily identifiable are the strict parallels that can be drawn between these Ukiyo-e masters and today's contempories in Manga.
This exhibit conveniently prefaced Murakami's show. Ironically (or not), Murakami was trained in the traditional art of Japan before breaking through and coining a phrase of his own: "Superflat". The Brooklyn Museum utilized Murakami's art historical theory of Superflat and gave it a proper display.
Upon entering the show on the fifth floor, one met Miss Ko2. Wearing what mimicked a waitress suit with blonde hair, large perky breasts and legs that never end, she stood eager and willing to please. The figure is an embodiment of the otaku subculture in Japan. As with Hiropan and Second Mission Miss Ko2, who appeared later in the exhibit, Murakami explores his own cultural misgivings. The otaku is characterized as “lonely and psychologically disturbed…[one] who exemplif[ies] the ‘murderous and anti-social…’"*. Imagine a young boy in front of his WOW game on the computer all day. His feminine ideal is warped. With these unreal femmes, Murakami draws from the otaku fantasy creations while making social commentary on a culture, perhaps, too connected by machinery--or not connected at all.
Moving into the center of this part of the show, one was drawn to three figures suspended on a circular plate. Meet Second Mission Ko2. This was, by far my favourite piece in the show. Murakami portrays Ko2 with blue hair, naked breasts, torso and genitals and cyborg legs and arms. Move to the second figure of Second Mission Ko2, and you saw that she was transforming like a...well, Transformer. Her breast plate (which extended down to her naked vagina) was lifting outward toward the viewer so the viewer was forced to meet head on with her bare prepubescent genitalia. Hard to notice much else when a resin clitoris is in your face, but examining the work, you could almost hear engines decompressing and gears pumping. Moving to the third and final figure, she had finally morphed into a jet. Rainbow wings and colored arms and legs that folded up nicely to create a masculine piece of machinery. A comment on the (manufactured and undervalued) role of women in Japanese society or coincidence? I think the former, not the later.
The next exciting piece of the gallery was immediately to the right upon entering the center circle. Behind a wall you were introduced to Murakami's animated creations: Kanye West's music video and his own "guardians" (as they've been dubbed) Kaikai and Kiki. Kaikai and Kiki star in 10-11 minute short films with both pathos and bathos. Also, you got to preview Murakami's live action film "Dharma" set to appear summer 2009. I won't give anything away (actually, there isn't much to give away, as there was no real dialogue in the preview), but it is definitely going to be exciting! Murakami truly has his eggs in many baskets.
Moving on, once you got past this initial gallery, you entered into a fully functioning store that sold Louis Vuitton bags. Luscious. That's all I have to say. But, if you didn't already know, Carl Lagerfeld (LV fashion designer) asked Murakami to collaborate with him on LV Bags a while back, thus those crazy eyeballs and bright colors you see on LV nowadays: Murakami's doing.
After being "oooed and ahhhed" by the beautiful Louis Vuitton bags, you moved into a room where you were surrounded by daisy faces. And I do mean literally surrounded because the walls have sheets of daisy face wallpaper on them. Not an inch of white wall is showing (imagine the work that went into that!). In the middle is a resin sculpture of Daisy faces and other kawaii things while more paintings adorn the wall. One truly feels Murakami's idea of "Superflat" in this room.
Next stop is the fourth floor. Down here, you met Hiropon and her counterpart My Lonesome Cowboy and more depictions of Kaikia and Kiki. (If you aren't already familiar with Hiropon, she was on display at the Denver Art Museum two summers ago for the contemporary art exhibit. She was the naked one with pink hair and obscene breasts squirting a circle of milk around herself. But we didn't get to see her companion because the DAM thought it too sexually provacative...hmmm....wacky ethics, anyone? Oh, and another quick side note: The Logan's were lending a piece to this show, too--wow!) One painting that stood out to me in this bit of the exhibit...the title currently escapes me, I apologize, was very large and depicted Kaikai spewing the most colorful and beautiful bile out of her sharp-toothed mouth as Kiki stood in the corner with Japanese prayer flags on a hill. (I'm leaving out a LOT of detail for this picture, here). It was, by far, the most violent work in the show and speaks directly to Japan's rather recent war history. Something which Murakami draws on profusely.
Exiting the show, there was a gift store where you could drop $42.oo on a t-shirt or $100.oo on daisy face pillows or $65.oo on the show's catalog. I imagine Murakami sits laughing all day in his studio as people pay outrageous prices for his mass manufactured works. How's that for art of the 21st century?
***For Works Cited Contact Author.
Friday, June 6, 2008
India
Hey readers,
I leave for NYC and India tomorrow, so there will not be any posts until I return around July 26. But when I get back: Hold on to your booties. It will be art history/review/opinion post time galore.
Look forward to:
A review of the Murakami show in Brooklyn, NYC
An essay on Himalayan and Buddhist Art and Architecture
Loads of pictures of Indian art and architecture taken by this very author
Thanks everyone for understanding! See you all in a couple months!
Jullay and Namaste!
Moriah
I leave for NYC and India tomorrow, so there will not be any posts until I return around July 26. But when I get back: Hold on to your booties. It will be art history/review/opinion post time galore.
Look forward to:
A review of the Murakami show in Brooklyn, NYC
An essay on Himalayan and Buddhist Art and Architecture
Loads of pictures of Indian art and architecture taken by this very author
Thanks everyone for understanding! See you all in a couple months!
Jullay and Namaste!
Moriah
Monday, June 2, 2008
STOP! Collaborate and Listen....I'm back with a brand new addition of:
JUNE 2, 2008 An Orphan Works Update
Backers of the House version of the Orphan Works bill are now asking artists and photographers to oppose the Senate bill unless it’s amended to contain at least the “minimum provisions” that appear in the House version.
Although they don’t say so, opposing the Senate bill in this manner is a vote FOR the House bill.
We’ve been asked to explain why:
The Senate bill is similar to the bill we opposed in 2006. The House bill (H.R. 5889) is the result of a year and a half of closed door negotiations between Congress and representatives and lobbyists for special interest groups. These groups have agreed to either endorse the House bill or remain neutral to insure its passage.
The House bill endorses the concept of coerced “voluntary” registration with commercial databases and seeks to make these databases infringer-friendly.
– It would require infringers to file a simple “notice of use” before they infringe.
– It calls for an archive of the notices to be maintained by the Copyright Office or an approved third party.
Why do backers of the House bill want these databases to be infringer-friendly?
Because to thrive, commercial databases (registries) will have to do a robust business in rights-clearing and orphan certification. That means encouraging infringers to infringe.
How will these registries work? No details have been given, but experience with image banks suggests the following:
For unregistered work: infringers will use the registries to identify pictures that aren’t registered. Infringers will probably pay the registry a search fee, then use or market the “orphans” like royalty-free art.
For registered work: the registries will act as a kind of stock house: Users will go to them for one-stop shopping to clear rights to your pictures. The registry will probably charge you a commission when they do.
In other words, urging Congress to pass the House bill makes very little sense to us unless your business or organization expects to become a commercial registry. We believe the only way to oppose these bills is to oppose them both.
If you agree, now’s the time to write Congress or write again.
You can urge Congress to oppose these bills by linking here to a special letter.
Tell Your Senators and Representatives to Oppose the Orphan Works Act at:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11442621
Backers of the House version of the Orphan Works bill are now asking artists and photographers to oppose the Senate bill unless it’s amended to contain at least the “minimum provisions” that appear in the House version.
Although they don’t say so, opposing the Senate bill in this manner is a vote FOR the House bill.
We’ve been asked to explain why:
The Senate bill is similar to the bill we opposed in 2006. The House bill (H.R. 5889) is the result of a year and a half of closed door negotiations between Congress and representatives and lobbyists for special interest groups. These groups have agreed to either endorse the House bill or remain neutral to insure its passage.
The House bill endorses the concept of coerced “voluntary” registration with commercial databases and seeks to make these databases infringer-friendly.
– It would require infringers to file a simple “notice of use” before they infringe.
– It calls for an archive of the notices to be maintained by the Copyright Office or an approved third party.
Why do backers of the House bill want these databases to be infringer-friendly?
Because to thrive, commercial databases (registries) will have to do a robust business in rights-clearing and orphan certification. That means encouraging infringers to infringe.
How will these registries work? No details have been given, but experience with image banks suggests the following:
For unregistered work: infringers will use the registries to identify pictures that aren’t registered. Infringers will probably pay the registry a search fee, then use or market the “orphans” like royalty-free art.
For registered work: the registries will act as a kind of stock house: Users will go to them for one-stop shopping to clear rights to your pictures. The registry will probably charge you a commission when they do.
In other words, urging Congress to pass the House bill makes very little sense to us unless your business or organization expects to become a commercial registry. We believe the only way to oppose these bills is to oppose them both.
If you agree, now’s the time to write Congress or write again.
You can urge Congress to oppose these bills by linking here to a special letter.
Tell Your Senators and Representatives to Oppose the Orphan Works Act at:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11442621
Monday, May 19, 2008
Time For Another Round of "Comments That I Think Are Ridiculous"!
Hey readers (all two of you),
It has recently come to my attention that there are many people out there who think that the Orphan Art Bill is all fine and dandy and ONLY affects works whose authors a] have been dead for 170 years and/or b] cannot be located.
Allow me to clear something up for those who believe that that is all this bill does and believe that it is harmless.
If this bill passes, there will be registries where artists will have to register their work. Ahem, excuse me, pay to register their work and have it copyrighted. There has been no definite information given as to how many registries there will be, but it has been proposed that there will be many and they will be online, instead of one big base. Now, with that history, here is an illustration:
Say artist Jane produced 1,000 sketches, 120 preliminary planning cartoons and 8 paintings. If she wants those ideas and those pieces of her art to remain in her control and copyrighted, she will have to register every single piece. And let's say it's $5.00 to register each piece. That's $5,640 a year to have YOUR OWN WORK OWNED BY YOU . Now, if she accidentally drops that sketch carrying all her art supplies to the studio and someone working for, oh say, Camel cigarettes finds that sketch, they must then go to registries (let's say...5) and do a reasonable search (mind you, there may be many, many, many registries...so what constitutes a reasonable search, you ask? Yeah...I'm asking, too) and if they cannot find the owner, JACKPOT! It's theirs to advertise with and you have no say and no ownership of your work.
This bill does NOT protect only old works and it doesn't protect work made outside of the USA.
Also, if Jane realises what has happened, to get any retribution, she must find exactly WHO took her work and how many times and where in the whole WORLD it was used.
I don't know about you, but to me, it's pretty damn clear that this bill has some nice loopholes...don't you think?
That is why this bill is so important and if it passes...say goodbye to art as you know it.
So, comments that I think are ridiculous: Comments made by those who have NOT done their research and believe this bill is not a serious threat.
It has recently come to my attention that there are many people out there who think that the Orphan Art Bill is all fine and dandy and ONLY affects works whose authors a] have been dead for 170 years and/or b] cannot be located.
Allow me to clear something up for those who believe that that is all this bill does and believe that it is harmless.
If this bill passes, there will be registries where artists will have to register their work. Ahem, excuse me, pay to register their work and have it copyrighted. There has been no definite information given as to how many registries there will be, but it has been proposed that there will be many and they will be online, instead of one big base. Now, with that history, here is an illustration:
Say artist Jane produced 1,000 sketches, 120 preliminary planning cartoons and 8 paintings. If she wants those ideas and those pieces of her art to remain in her control and copyrighted, she will have to register every single piece. And let's say it's $5.00 to register each piece. That's $5,640 a year to have YOUR OWN WORK OWNED BY YOU . Now, if she accidentally drops that sketch carrying all her art supplies to the studio and someone working for, oh say, Camel cigarettes finds that sketch, they must then go to registries (let's say...5) and do a reasonable search (mind you, there may be many, many, many registries...so what constitutes a reasonable search, you ask? Yeah...I'm asking, too) and if they cannot find the owner, JACKPOT! It's theirs to advertise with and you have no say and no ownership of your work.
This bill does NOT protect only old works and it doesn't protect work made outside of the USA.
Also, if Jane realises what has happened, to get any retribution, she must find exactly WHO took her work and how many times and where in the whole WORLD it was used.
I don't know about you, but to me, it's pretty damn clear that this bill has some nice loopholes...don't you think?
That is why this bill is so important and if it passes...say goodbye to art as you know it.
So, comments that I think are ridiculous: Comments made by those who have NOT done their research and believe this bill is not a serious threat.
ATTENTION READERS!
HEY READERS! Sorry for the short absence on my part: finals and graduation of my boyfriend! Anyway, here is some EXTREMELY IMPORTANT NEWS AND WE NEED ALL THE HELP WE CAN GET!
"Call to Action
Last Thursday the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed their Orphan Works Act.
It is now headed for the full Senate.
If you’ve written before, now’s the time to write again.
Urge your senator to oppose this bill."
WE'VE GOT TO STOP THIS BILL! EVERYBODY WRITE TO OUR SENATORS! It's super easy. You just enter your zip code and your senators come up and then there's prewritten letter AND a space for you to add your own CONCERNS AND DISAPPOINTMENT!!!!! Please, I'll say it again, if I haven't said it enough. If this bill gets passed, the art world will be fucked. And that affects EVERYONE.
"Because it has been negotiated behind closed doors, introduced on short notice and fast-tracked for imminent passage without open hearings, ask that this bill not be passed until it can be exposed to an open, informed and transparent public debate.
We’ve drafted a special letter for this purpose.
You can deep link to it here:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11389061
Contact your Senator in opposition to S.2913 NOW
The House Judiciary Committee is considering H.R. 5889, the companion bill now. Please write them again:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11389081
Contact your Congressman in opposition to H.R. 5889 NOW
2 minutes is all it takes to write your senator and representatives and fight for your copyrights. Over 68,000 e-mail messages have been sent so far.
Don't Let Congress Orphan Your Work
Please forward this message to every artist you know."
THIS BILL LEGALIZES STEALING. WE MUST STOP IT.
"Call to Action
Last Thursday the Senate Judiciary Committee endorsed their Orphan Works Act.
It is now headed for the full Senate.
If you’ve written before, now’s the time to write again.
Urge your senator to oppose this bill."
WE'VE GOT TO STOP THIS BILL! EVERYBODY WRITE TO OUR SENATORS! It's super easy. You just enter your zip code and your senators come up and then there's prewritten letter AND a space for you to add your own CONCERNS AND DISAPPOINTMENT!!!!! Please, I'll say it again, if I haven't said it enough. If this bill gets passed, the art world will be fucked. And that affects EVERYONE.
"Because it has been negotiated behind closed doors, introduced on short notice and fast-tracked for imminent passage without open hearings, ask that this bill not be passed until it can be exposed to an open, informed and transparent public debate.
We’ve drafted a special letter for this purpose.
You can deep link to it here:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11389061
Contact your Senator in opposition to S.2913 NOW
The House Judiciary Committee is considering H.R. 5889, the companion bill now. Please write them again:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/issues/alert/?alertid=11389081
Contact your Congressman in opposition to H.R. 5889 NOW
2 minutes is all it takes to write your senator and representatives and fight for your copyrights. Over 68,000 e-mail messages have been sent so far.
Don't Let Congress Orphan Your Work
Please forward this message to every artist you know."
THIS BILL LEGALIZES STEALING. WE MUST STOP IT.
Monday, May 12, 2008
This One's Important!
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS’ PARTNERSHIP
Some backers of the controversial Orphan Works bill say they’re launching a campaign to “Rescue Orphan Works.”
From whom?
We’re not the ones interested in infringing other people’s copyrights.
We’re only interested in protecting our own.
If the “Rescue Orphan Works” folks really want to use only true orphaned work, they’d join us in asking that this bill be drafted accordingly.
From our written statement submitted to the Senate April 30, 2008 http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/ow_docs
We believe the orphan works problem can be and should be solved with carefully crafted, specific limited exemptions.
• An exemption could be tailored to solve family photo restoration and reproduction issues.
• Usage for genealogy research is probably already covered by fair use, but could rate an exemption if deemed necessary.
• Limited exemptions could be designed for documentary filmmakers.
• Libraries and archives already have generous exemptions for their missions. However, if they believe they need expanded access to work whose authors are hard to find, we’d suggest that Congress adopt a variant of the Orphan Works clearance system in use in Canada.
Canada has created a statutory licensing scheme that allows licenses for the use of published works to be issued by the Copyright Board of Canada on behalf of unlocatable copyright owners.
The license is issued by the Canadian Copyright Board. Decisions are made on a case-by- case basis through application to the Board. If the Board is satisfied by the applicant’s efforts of e-mails, phone calls, written correspondence, approaches to copyright collectives, Internet searches, etc., then it may issue a non-exclusive license which is valid only in Canada, subject to any terms and conditions it sees fit.
http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0507/msg00096.html
A system such as this would serve potential users of orphaned work by allowing them to clear rights in an orderly, verified way. Therefore we respectfully ask that the Senate conduct further hearings to resolve the specific problem of providing public access to true orphaned works. Our objections to S.2913 – which incorporates the proposals made by the Copyright Office – is that its effects cannot be limited to old or abandoned copyrights.
There’s no need to “rescue orphan works” from artists.
And you don’t save orphans by making new ones!
Help solve the real orphan works problem: Don't Let Congress Orphan Your Work
2 minutes is all it takes to write Congress and protect your copyright:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Please forward this message to every artist you know.
Some backers of the controversial Orphan Works bill say they’re launching a campaign to “Rescue Orphan Works.”
From whom?
We’re not the ones interested in infringing other people’s copyrights.
We’re only interested in protecting our own.
If the “Rescue Orphan Works” folks really want to use only true orphaned work, they’d join us in asking that this bill be drafted accordingly.
From our written statement submitted to the Senate April 30, 2008 http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/ow_docs
We believe the orphan works problem can be and should be solved with carefully crafted, specific limited exemptions.
• An exemption could be tailored to solve family photo restoration and reproduction issues.
• Usage for genealogy research is probably already covered by fair use, but could rate an exemption if deemed necessary.
• Limited exemptions could be designed for documentary filmmakers.
• Libraries and archives already have generous exemptions for their missions. However, if they believe they need expanded access to work whose authors are hard to find, we’d suggest that Congress adopt a variant of the Orphan Works clearance system in use in Canada.
Canada has created a statutory licensing scheme that allows licenses for the use of published works to be issued by the Copyright Board of Canada on behalf of unlocatable copyright owners.
The license is issued by the Canadian Copyright Board. Decisions are made on a case-by- case basis through application to the Board. If the Board is satisfied by the applicant’s efforts of e-mails, phone calls, written correspondence, approaches to copyright collectives, Internet searches, etc., then it may issue a non-exclusive license which is valid only in Canada, subject to any terms and conditions it sees fit.
http://www.library.yale.edu/~llicense/ListArchives/0507/msg00096.html
A system such as this would serve potential users of orphaned work by allowing them to clear rights in an orderly, verified way. Therefore we respectfully ask that the Senate conduct further hearings to resolve the specific problem of providing public access to true orphaned works. Our objections to S.2913 – which incorporates the proposals made by the Copyright Office – is that its effects cannot be limited to old or abandoned copyrights.
There’s no need to “rescue orphan works” from artists.
And you don’t save orphans by making new ones!
Help solve the real orphan works problem: Don't Let Congress Orphan Your Work
2 minutes is all it takes to write Congress and protect your copyright:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Please forward this message to every artist you know.
Saturday, May 10, 2008
Update on Orphan Works Act
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS’ PARTNERSHIP
Since yesterday, over 31, 000 letters have gone out from our Orphan Works advocacy site.
Q: What can we do next?
1. Write the House Judiciary Committee. We’ve set up a special alert to contact members of this important committee.
Go to our Take Action/Alert site: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Look for the sample letter labeled "Contact House Judiciary Committee NOW" and send it.
If your Representative is not a member of the House Judiciary Committee, this will send him a message asking him to contact his colleagues on that Committee on your behalf, urging them to oppose the bill.
2. Ask for support from family and friends:
Please ask your friends and family (5 to 10 others) who support your creative work to also go to the site.
They can follow the instructions to easily send a message of opposition to this reckless bill.
Look for the sample letter labeled "For Supporters of Visual Artists - Wrong to Weaken
Copyright Law" and send it.
3. Spread the word to the public: Photosharing on Web will now be at risk:
Please alert your friends who post photos to the web their personal property will be at risk.
Look for the sample letter labeled “For the Image-Making Public - Protect Personal
Property”and send it.
For more information about the Orphan Works Act of 2008:
IPA Statement to House Subcommittee March 20, 2008:
http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=00261
IPA Senate Mark-up Comments April 30, 2008: http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/ow_docs
Geneva/ May 7, 2008 Orphan Works Bill Catches Global Attention/ Intellectual Property Watch/
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1028
MP3 Interview: http://www.sellyourtvconceptnow.com/orphan.html
YouTube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=CqBZd0cP5Yc
Since yesterday, over 31, 000 letters have gone out from our Orphan Works advocacy site.
Q: What can we do next?
1. Write the House Judiciary Committee. We’ve set up a special alert to contact members of this important committee.
Go to our Take Action/Alert site: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Look for the sample letter labeled "Contact House Judiciary Committee NOW" and send it.
If your Representative is not a member of the House Judiciary Committee, this will send him a message asking him to contact his colleagues on that Committee on your behalf, urging them to oppose the bill.
2. Ask for support from family and friends:
Please ask your friends and family (5 to 10 others) who support your creative work to also go to the site.
They can follow the instructions to easily send a message of opposition to this reckless bill.
Look for the sample letter labeled "For Supporters of Visual Artists - Wrong to Weaken
Copyright Law" and send it.
3. Spread the word to the public: Photosharing on Web will now be at risk:
Please alert your friends who post photos to the web their personal property will be at risk.
Look for the sample letter labeled “For the Image-Making Public - Protect Personal
Property”and send it.
For more information about the Orphan Works Act of 2008:
IPA Statement to House Subcommittee March 20, 2008:
http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=00261
IPA Senate Mark-up Comments April 30, 2008: http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/ow_docs
Geneva/ May 7, 2008 Orphan Works Bill Catches Global Attention/ Intellectual Property Watch/
http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1028
MP3 Interview: http://www.sellyourtvconceptnow.com/orphan.html
YouTube: http://youtube.com/watch?v=CqBZd0cP5Yc
Friday, May 9, 2008
Comments That I Think Are Ridiculous.
*I feel as though I should preface this post by making sure my readers know that my blog is entirely subjective at times...and this is another one of those times.
The reception for the UCD BFA show was last night. It was amazing! I believe a record 530 people attended! Now, of course, when you get that many people coming to an art show reception, some of them are bound to say stupid shit. And lo and behold, I received two comments that literally made me want to shove art history down the person's throats in the form of a wordy and pretentious lecture.
Now, for those of you who don't know: John Lopez is my significant other. Also, the artist of Elementary. (See previous posted review about this show.) And weirdly enough--or, I suppose it's not that weird considering his piece is rather controversial...anyway, both of the comments I received regarded his work. So, okay, I admit, I have a little personal interest invested in the piece and will defend the artist at all costs. Which, perhaps, is what fueled the fire for my reactions to these comments. Here were the comments:
1. Made by a twenty-something who walked straight into the gallery and over to John's piece and started playing with the controller. All fine and dandy until he goes searching under John's files on the PlayStation looking for a game. I come over and politely inform him that I can fix that and take it back to the WORK OF ART THAT IS ON DISPLAY. No, no, he doesn't give me the controller, but instead looks at me and says, "So, when can I come in and play my Grand Theft Auto." Obviously thinking he was kidding, I laughed and tried again to get the controller from him. No...I didn't get it as he says, "Can't I come in and play my game?" At which point I realise to my horror: THIS GUY DOESN'T GET THAT THIS IS A WORK OF ART. At which point my tone went flat and I said, "No. You cannot come in a play your game. Please give me the controller so that I may fix the image."...or something to that affect. His girlfriend standing next to him was highly embarrassed and I can't say I blame her...
My point: comments that I think are ridiculous are ones that express the viewers entire lack of appreciation for a] the art and b] the artist's hard work.
2. Second remark was made by on older white woman who came up to me holding John's postcard and said point-blank, "So, this guy advocates the killing of children." Not as a question, she said it like it was truth. "No! No, not at all!" I quickly retort ready to explain his work before I am cut off with, "It doesn't? That's what it looks like. He wants children to kill other children. That's what he took a picture of." Shortly, I realise that there is nothing I can say to help her understand his social critique because she's set in stone that John advocates children with guns. And just when I am thinking, "What can I say...?" she says, "Well. That's what it looks like." And as I open my mouth she turns and walks away.
My point: comments that I think are ridiculous are closed-minded remarks that are seemingly ignorant and leave no room for outside knowledge or critical analysis.
Perhaps I should start making "Comments that I think are ridiculous" a regular segment...
The reception for the UCD BFA show was last night. It was amazing! I believe a record 530 people attended! Now, of course, when you get that many people coming to an art show reception, some of them are bound to say stupid shit. And lo and behold, I received two comments that literally made me want to shove art history down the person's throats in the form of a wordy and pretentious lecture.
Now, for those of you who don't know: John Lopez is my significant other. Also, the artist of Elementary. (See previous posted review about this show.) And weirdly enough--or, I suppose it's not that weird considering his piece is rather controversial...anyway, both of the comments I received regarded his work. So, okay, I admit, I have a little personal interest invested in the piece and will defend the artist at all costs. Which, perhaps, is what fueled the fire for my reactions to these comments. Here were the comments:
1. Made by a twenty-something who walked straight into the gallery and over to John's piece and started playing with the controller. All fine and dandy until he goes searching under John's files on the PlayStation looking for a game. I come over and politely inform him that I can fix that and take it back to the WORK OF ART THAT IS ON DISPLAY. No, no, he doesn't give me the controller, but instead looks at me and says, "So, when can I come in and play my Grand Theft Auto." Obviously thinking he was kidding, I laughed and tried again to get the controller from him. No...I didn't get it as he says, "Can't I come in and play my game?" At which point I realise to my horror: THIS GUY DOESN'T GET THAT THIS IS A WORK OF ART. At which point my tone went flat and I said, "No. You cannot come in a play your game. Please give me the controller so that I may fix the image."...or something to that affect. His girlfriend standing next to him was highly embarrassed and I can't say I blame her...
My point: comments that I think are ridiculous are ones that express the viewers entire lack of appreciation for a] the art and b] the artist's hard work.
2. Second remark was made by on older white woman who came up to me holding John's postcard and said point-blank, "So, this guy advocates the killing of children." Not as a question, she said it like it was truth. "No! No, not at all!" I quickly retort ready to explain his work before I am cut off with, "It doesn't? That's what it looks like. He wants children to kill other children. That's what he took a picture of." Shortly, I realise that there is nothing I can say to help her understand his social critique because she's set in stone that John advocates children with guns. And just when I am thinking, "What can I say...?" she says, "Well. That's what it looks like." And as I open my mouth she turns and walks away.
My point: comments that I think are ridiculous are closed-minded remarks that are seemingly ignorant and leave no room for outside knowledge or critical analysis.
Perhaps I should start making "Comments that I think are ridiculous" a regular segment...
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Send a Letter of NO SUPPORT!
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP
Take Action: Don't Let Congress Orphan Our Work
"We’ve set up an online site for visual artists to e-mail their Senators and Representatives with one click.
This site is open to professional artists, photographers and any member of the image-making public.
We’ve provided sample letters from individuals representing different sectors of the visual arts.
If you’re opposed to the Orphan Works act, this site is yours to use.
For international artists and our colleagues overseas, we’ve provided a special link, with a sample letter and instructions as to whom to write.
2 minutes is all it takes to write Congress and protect your copyright:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Please forward this message to every artist you know."
If you wish to be added to their mailing list, email the at: illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com
Take Action: Don't Let Congress Orphan Our Work
"We’ve set up an online site for visual artists to e-mail their Senators and Representatives with one click.
This site is open to professional artists, photographers and any member of the image-making public.
We’ve provided sample letters from individuals representing different sectors of the visual arts.
If you’re opposed to the Orphan Works act, this site is yours to use.
For international artists and our colleagues overseas, we’ve provided a special link, with a sample letter and instructions as to whom to write.
2 minutes is all it takes to write Congress and protect your copyright:
http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/
Please forward this message to every artist you know."
If you wish to be added to their mailing list, email the at: illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Orphaned Art Bill Meeting in NYC
I just received this email:
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP
A Reminder:
Tonight, Tuesday, May 6 at 6:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time (U.S.)
Don’t Let Congress Orphan Your Work
An open forum to oppose the Orphan Works Act
The Society of Illustrators
128 East 63rd Street
New York, NY 10065
Admission will be free
Panelists:
Terry Brown Director, American Society of Illustrators Partnership, Director Emeritus, Society of Illustrators
Constance Evans Executive Director, Advertising Photographers of America, artist
Dr. Theodore Feder President, Artists Rights Society
Brad Holland Artist, Co-founder, Illustrators Partnership
Cynthia Turner Medical illustrator, Board Member, Illustrators Partnership
William Vasquez Photographer, Co-Chair, Advertising Photographers of America/NY Chapter
This event will be streamed live here: http://video.cmitnyc.com/society/soi_2008_05_06.html
If you unable to access it tonight, it will be archived for delayed webcast, starting tomorrow
Also: stay tuned for a link to our push-button letter-writing website: Take Action/ Write Congress
FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP
A Reminder:
Tonight, Tuesday, May 6 at 6:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time (U.S.)
Don’t Let Congress Orphan Your Work
An open forum to oppose the Orphan Works Act
The Society of Illustrators
128 East 63rd Street
New York, NY 10065
Admission will be free
Panelists:
Terry Brown Director, American Society of Illustrators Partnership, Director Emeritus, Society of Illustrators
Constance Evans Executive Director, Advertising Photographers of America, artist
Dr. Theodore Feder President, Artists Rights Society
Brad Holland Artist, Co-founder, Illustrators Partnership
Cynthia Turner Medical illustrator, Board Member, Illustrators Partnership
William Vasquez Photographer, Co-Chair, Advertising Photographers of America/NY Chapter
This event will be streamed live here: http://video.cmitnyc.com/society/soi_2008_05_06.html
If you unable to access it tonight, it will be archived for delayed webcast, starting tomorrow
Also: stay tuned for a link to our push-button letter-writing website: Take Action/ Write Congress
Monday, May 5, 2008
An Opinionated Rant on Painting, America and Contemporary Art
I recently overheard a professor saying that no matter what you do, you are always contemporary...and it makes perfect sense. If you are speaking only of the concept of time. Of course, if you are present here and now, you exist here and now and, therefore, what you do is here and now. But that does not necessarily mean that what you produce is artistically here and now. I also heard said professor say that if you take all of what's been done, jumble it up and reorganise it, you've got something entirely new. Not so, if you ask me. If you jumble it up, you've just got jumbled up art history that is easily picked apart and assigned to its proper place.
I imagine that being a contemporary painter must be difficult!
For a medium so long been used, the only frontier left is to paint the future on vapor. (If someone figures out how to do this, I will call you the greatest contemporary painter of our time...not that that means much coming from a BFA student...) So many times, I walk into a gallery and I see paintings that imitate one considered "Great" or "Genius" and I think that "Great" or "Genius" must be turning in their grave. And yet, "appropriation" seems to be the current genre we are stuck in when it comes to painting. You cannot just pull from the past and call it contemporary because YOU are alive at the moment. How about finding contemporary content...content that is contemporary because it is unique to our time?
Which leads me to, yet, another concern...our time is unique. In America, we are suffering. We are losing the battle (on every front imaginable) and everyone is feeling the pain. Where are the contemporary American artists? Where are the American artists willing to make a stand against or for contemporary issues--where are those who are labeled from abroad as "American"? What is inherently American art? Is there such a thing?
Let me say this: look away from those archaic mediums and baby boomer era artists. They've got it wrong. It recently came to my attention that some of them think that good American art has to come from either: a drug-crazed ass hole or a narcissistic "mad scientist" (to quote PAINTER Stephan Batura). No. This is the year 2008 and Andy Warhol is dead. We must take American art into the age of modernity and reinvent the artist persona to fit the individual--Andy Warhol created the artist celebrity, but that doesn't work by pure default. When artist is equal to celebrity, the art fades into the background and the story is then written about the artist. Don't get me wrong, biography is important and good information, but what then of the art? THE ART?
This country is already viewed as a nation of apathetic egotistical jerk-offs. Why allow our art to continue on in such a light, too? We can no longer languish in a past crumbled to bits.
All of that said, painting still has its role in contemporary art, but it cannot stand alone any longer. It can be a supplement and be "Great". Or, painting has got to stop trying to reinvent and start INVENTING. Fabricate a new contemporary, American identity. And while you're at it...try something new...I'm so TIRED OF PAINT.
I imagine that being a contemporary painter must be difficult!
For a medium so long been used, the only frontier left is to paint the future on vapor. (If someone figures out how to do this, I will call you the greatest contemporary painter of our time...not that that means much coming from a BFA student...) So many times, I walk into a gallery and I see paintings that imitate one considered "Great" or "Genius" and I think that "Great" or "Genius" must be turning in their grave. And yet, "appropriation" seems to be the current genre we are stuck in when it comes to painting. You cannot just pull from the past and call it contemporary because YOU are alive at the moment. How about finding contemporary content...content that is contemporary because it is unique to our time?
Which leads me to, yet, another concern...our time is unique. In America, we are suffering. We are losing the battle (on every front imaginable) and everyone is feeling the pain. Where are the contemporary American artists? Where are the American artists willing to make a stand against or for contemporary issues--where are those who are labeled from abroad as "American"? What is inherently American art? Is there such a thing?
Let me say this: look away from those archaic mediums and baby boomer era artists. They've got it wrong. It recently came to my attention that some of them think that good American art has to come from either: a drug-crazed ass hole or a narcissistic "mad scientist" (to quote PAINTER Stephan Batura). No. This is the year 2008 and Andy Warhol is dead. We must take American art into the age of modernity and reinvent the artist persona to fit the individual--Andy Warhol created the artist celebrity, but that doesn't work by pure default. When artist is equal to celebrity, the art fades into the background and the story is then written about the artist. Don't get me wrong, biography is important and good information, but what then of the art? THE ART?
This country is already viewed as a nation of apathetic egotistical jerk-offs. Why allow our art to continue on in such a light, too? We can no longer languish in a past crumbled to bits.
All of that said, painting still has its role in contemporary art, but it cannot stand alone any longer. It can be a supplement and be "Great". Or, painting has got to stop trying to reinvent and start INVENTING. Fabricate a new contemporary, American identity. And while you're at it...try something new...I'm so TIRED OF PAINT.
Saturday, May 3, 2008
UCD BFA Thesis Show
Currently, at Emmanuel Gallery (located on Auraria Campus in Denver, Colorado), the University of Colorado Denver is housing its graduating BFA students' thesis show. Painters, sculptors, photographers and digital designers showcase the work they've been creating for the past year as they get geared up to head out into the world or off to grad school. Organized by professor and guest curator, Mary Connelly, it promises to be one of the more cohesive and exciting BFA shows.
This show embodies the contemporary spirit more so than any other BFA show that I've attended in my three years on campus. Considering the fact that Denver is rather isolated from the world of up-and-coming modern art, the student work in this show is on a higher level and some of these artists have the potential to become internationally known.
Recalling to mind Delaroche's statement that, "Painting is dead," upon the invention of photography, I tend to agree with him. Thus, when a BFA show is just flat canvas after flat canvas nailed to the wall, I get very bored very quickly. This show, however, contains a broad-ranging representation of art history with the inclusion of most genre of media: wood working, painting, photography, digital animation, film, and sculpting. Also, using more than just their sense of sight, the public is encouraged to interact and get personal with at least two pieces in this show.
Among the most exciting artists showing, sculptor and photographer, Timothy Flood's work On the Evolution of Spirit, Self and Dimension, showcases eight hand-crafted optical boxes, which are to be interacted with by the audience. Displayed in the middle of the gallery with a decidedly Eastern Asian flavor, one may be mislead as to the content of his work (thinking it somehow Asian). However, while there is no immediately recognizable Asian influence, his presentation works well to enhance the work. As you peer into Flood's flawlessly hand-crafted boxes, which should be aimed toward the soft light provided by two nearby lamps, his figurative photographic images appear three-dimensional and equally soft with a calming, nostalgic quality. Thus, his rather Asian presentation only increases the viewer's Zen as they gaze into his boxes. Flood's work is, by far, one of the most well-crafted and more traditionally beautiful pieces in the gallery.
The second artist I'd like to highlight is photographer, John Lopez. Lopez is an artist who uses an unorthodox, yet, ingenious method of display to showcase two images from his set entitled Elementary. Using two PlayStation consoles (complete with wireless controllers--oh, what will they come up with next?) that are hooked up to two 46 inch flat screen Toshiba televisions, Lopez displays his images digitally on the LCD screen. Lopez's work is directly political and socially critical of the American society in which he was born and raised. Commenting on a country desensitized and apathetic to violence, Lopez's images are at once shocking, frightful and engaging. Like Flood, Lopez encourages his viewer get personal with his work by using the wireless controllers to navigate and scan his images allowing his audience to zoom in on details of facial expressions, gun make and model and droplets of blood.
Although there are many talented artists in this show, the last I'd like to bring to your attention (to whet your artistic appetite) is photographer Michele Wysocki. Wysocki, who is soon moving to San Fransisco to attend SFAI (Congratulations!), has created 9 images in her set Scientificity. Her photography reflects the pervasive gender problem within the world of science, commonly regarded as a "man's territory". Utilizing an unusual circular format for her images, Wysocki calls to mind the Petri dish and photographs items which reflect a decidedly feminine way of life. With titles like "Lungs" cleverly attached to a pair of heel support shoe inserts, her black and white photography propels itself to the forefront of modernity as she aligns her work with contemporary issues breathing new life into a decidedly antiquated photographic media.
UCD's BFA Thesis show promises to be exciting and artistically fashionable. If you're in the Denver area and can make it out to this show, I recommend it. And take names, because you'll definitely be seeing some of them again.
*Emmanuel Gallery is located on Auraria Campus. The gallery hours for this show are Monday, 5 May through Thursday, 8 May from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Friday, 9 May from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
The reception for this show (which is free and open to the public) will be held on Thursday, 8 May from 4-7 p.m.
For more information you can visit www.emmanuelgallery.org
This show embodies the contemporary spirit more so than any other BFA show that I've attended in my three years on campus. Considering the fact that Denver is rather isolated from the world of up-and-coming modern art, the student work in this show is on a higher level and some of these artists have the potential to become internationally known.
Recalling to mind Delaroche's statement that, "Painting is dead," upon the invention of photography, I tend to agree with him. Thus, when a BFA show is just flat canvas after flat canvas nailed to the wall, I get very bored very quickly. This show, however, contains a broad-ranging representation of art history with the inclusion of most genre of media: wood working, painting, photography, digital animation, film, and sculpting. Also, using more than just their sense of sight, the public is encouraged to interact and get personal with at least two pieces in this show.
Among the most exciting artists showing, sculptor and photographer, Timothy Flood's work On the Evolution of Spirit, Self and Dimension, showcases eight hand-crafted optical boxes, which are to be interacted with by the audience. Displayed in the middle of the gallery with a decidedly Eastern Asian flavor, one may be mislead as to the content of his work (thinking it somehow Asian). However, while there is no immediately recognizable Asian influence, his presentation works well to enhance the work. As you peer into Flood's flawlessly hand-crafted boxes, which should be aimed toward the soft light provided by two nearby lamps, his figurative photographic images appear three-dimensional and equally soft with a calming, nostalgic quality. Thus, his rather Asian presentation only increases the viewer's Zen as they gaze into his boxes. Flood's work is, by far, one of the most well-crafted and more traditionally beautiful pieces in the gallery.
The second artist I'd like to highlight is photographer, John Lopez. Lopez is an artist who uses an unorthodox, yet, ingenious method of display to showcase two images from his set entitled Elementary. Using two PlayStation consoles (complete with wireless controllers--oh, what will they come up with next?) that are hooked up to two 46 inch flat screen Toshiba televisions, Lopez displays his images digitally on the LCD screen. Lopez's work is directly political and socially critical of the American society in which he was born and raised. Commenting on a country desensitized and apathetic to violence, Lopez's images are at once shocking, frightful and engaging. Like Flood, Lopez encourages his viewer get personal with his work by using the wireless controllers to navigate and scan his images allowing his audience to zoom in on details of facial expressions, gun make and model and droplets of blood.
Although there are many talented artists in this show, the last I'd like to bring to your attention (to whet your artistic appetite) is photographer Michele Wysocki. Wysocki, who is soon moving to San Fransisco to attend SFAI (Congratulations!), has created 9 images in her set Scientificity. Her photography reflects the pervasive gender problem within the world of science, commonly regarded as a "man's territory". Utilizing an unusual circular format for her images, Wysocki calls to mind the Petri dish and photographs items which reflect a decidedly feminine way of life. With titles like "Lungs" cleverly attached to a pair of heel support shoe inserts, her black and white photography propels itself to the forefront of modernity as she aligns her work with contemporary issues breathing new life into a decidedly antiquated photographic media.
UCD's BFA Thesis show promises to be exciting and artistically fashionable. If you're in the Denver area and can make it out to this show, I recommend it. And take names, because you'll definitely be seeing some of them again.
*Emmanuel Gallery is located on Auraria Campus. The gallery hours for this show are Monday, 5 May through Thursday, 8 May from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Friday, 9 May from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.
The reception for this show (which is free and open to the public) will be held on Thursday, 8 May from 4-7 p.m.
For more information you can visit www.emmanuelgallery.org
Friday, May 2, 2008
Orphaned Art Bill
First order of business: To all artists,
And to all those who appreciate the arts and support artists may they be graphic designers, painters, photographers, sketchers, knitters, scuptors, what have you.
And to all those who care about copyright laws, your work being stolen or your creative rights, please go to this link and read this article:
Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All The Rights to Your Own Art
I highly recommend listening to the phone call interview with Brad Holland at the end of the article. It’s about 45 minutes (or so long), but well worth it. Holland explains exactly what this bill is trying to do and the loopholes that it is quietly slipping through. This bill is a REAL possibility, unfortunately, and as Simon says, this bill is counting on apathy from the art community. We cannot allow this bill to pass, so get out of your studio, put on some sunscreen and shades and get the word out.
Help protect international copyright laws and let us make the US obey them. Or the world of art as we know it will parish. In VERY short, this bill privatizes creativity–I didn’t think it was possible, either, but it is in this country, apparently. Oh, and everyone outside the US–your art is at risk as well. If this bill passes, there will be: No more googling your favourite artist. No more finding out the lastest in the contemporary art world. No more, no more, no more. No more posting your art ANYWHERE in ANY WAY. No more sharing.
PLEASE go to that link, I beg you and get on that mailing list so that we can stop these people from ruining the art world as we know it.
Thank you.
And to all those who appreciate the arts and support artists may they be graphic designers, painters, photographers, sketchers, knitters, scuptors, what have you.
And to all those who care about copyright laws, your work being stolen or your creative rights, please go to this link and read this article:
Mind Your Business: You Will Lose All The Rights to Your Own Art
I highly recommend listening to the phone call interview with Brad Holland at the end of the article. It’s about 45 minutes (or so long), but well worth it. Holland explains exactly what this bill is trying to do and the loopholes that it is quietly slipping through. This bill is a REAL possibility, unfortunately, and as Simon says, this bill is counting on apathy from the art community. We cannot allow this bill to pass, so get out of your studio, put on some sunscreen and shades and get the word out.
Help protect international copyright laws and let us make the US obey them. Or the world of art as we know it will parish. In VERY short, this bill privatizes creativity–I didn’t think it was possible, either, but it is in this country, apparently. Oh, and everyone outside the US–your art is at risk as well. If this bill passes, there will be: No more googling your favourite artist. No more finding out the lastest in the contemporary art world. No more, no more, no more. No more posting your art ANYWHERE in ANY WAY. No more sharing.
PLEASE go to that link, I beg you and get on that mailing list so that we can stop these people from ruining the art world as we know it.
Thank you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)